The Demise of the No Nofollow Movement
There is an ongoing controversy going on in our lovely blogosphere and it all originates with Andy Beard’s idea of making a great fuss over Google’s infamous “nofollow” link attribute.
Basically, it all started with a Bumpzee community, which promoted the drop of the nofollow tag from blog comments. For a period, everything was just peachy. People who adhered to this movement saw themselves as champion fighters against the evil Google, meaningful comments were pouring in and the community itself became one of the most respected ones on Bumpzee.
Well… it all went downhill afterwards. You see, all the modern blogging platforms slap a nofollow tag to comments by default, so before this movement came to life, comment spam was restricted to a few confused webmasters. When this community became popular though, shit began to fly and hit the fan in the most uncomfortable manner possible. Dofollow blog comments became the newest weapon in the arsenal of every decent spammer outthere and of course of those indecent ones too.
It didn’t take long for the blogosphere to react. Dave Naylor’s post is perhaps the most known example and extremely spot on while we are at it. Andy Beard of course defended his position, claiming that building a community comes first. One of his remarks in that post has attracted my attention:
Google doesn’t give penalties just because you decide to let those providing user generated content have a little link love.
With all the respect that Andy Beard deserves, this statement is just plain wrong.
Case in point:
A new thread pops up on DigitalPoint, let’s say… this one
What happens next? Well let’s take a look at some of these blogs, who are supposedly dofollow.
First target: This blog. Warning: the language there is quite colorful. Either way, a DUD and one that backfired badly.
Second target: the Shandyking blog. This one was a genuine dofollow blog at one point, but it backfired even worse . And the really sad part is that the blog owner got slapped with a huge Google penalty, the type that affects the SERP’s. If this doesn’t prove that Andy Beard is wrong, I don’t know what will.
Of course, this doesn’t mean that posting on dofollow blogs immediately equals spam. This is one of those gray areas. If you comment in a meaningful fashion on 3 dofollow blogs per day and you sign with your name, you’re as white hat as it gets, if on the other hand you comment something like “great post” on 1000 blogs per day and sign with “buy shit online” you’re the worst kind of spammer.
So how is this dofollow comment posting being done. One way is to hunt DigitalPoint for dofollow blog lists, but than you would be a lazy douchebag. If you want to do it like the pros, this walkthrough will be extremely helpful. Be aware though that some of the advice there has a spammish taint to it.
Final verdict: Most webmasters that have a dofollow blog will expect to have people posting for the sole reason of getting a backlink, as a matter of fact they are counting on it. What they do not want is spam. Learn the difference between spam and a good post and you can use this method safely. So where does this technique belong? Well… in the Zone of course. the Gray Hat Zone. As long as you are using it responsibly, there’s no danger in it.


















I didn’t just advocate removing nofollow, but also provided a huge amount of information over many months on how to mitigate negative effects.
I don’t think any blogger has a problem with giving something back to their core community.
Of the comments on my blog that actually make it through Spam Karma, discounting core audience who post reactions normally within 24 hours, 75% of the human comments on my blog get deleted as spam.
The key is for smart marketers to find ways to interract and profit from even the people who might be “spammers”, though many are misguided.
Anyone posting on my blog for the sole purpose of a backlink or self promotion is verging on breaking the consumer protection act in the UK, depending on which legal advice you take, because almost all of them are aiming their “marketing” at consumer products.
Actually breaking the law is probably the darkest side of blackhat.
I ignore threads on places like Digital point - I can see the referral IDs and one of these days I will just redirect them to some ads
[Reply]
The basic problem for a dofollow blog owner is SEO related. The main principle is that you can’t get penalized for incoming links, but you can for the outgoing ones. And the links that deliver penalties must not necessarily be with a “bad” anchor text, they can quite easily be genuine names with some real fine, genuine comments attached. The key here is to verify where these links point. IF it’s a FFA, adult or just in tough terms with Google, you’d be basically screwed.
As for your own blog, congrats for running a tight ship. Most bloggers though are not so technology savvy and the dark side of the dofollow movement plus the measures required to counteract them are roughly equivalent to a contract’s fine print. Everybody is supposed to read it, but nobody actually does.
Otherwise, thank you for dropping by.
Regards, George
[Reply]
Am I correct in reading this comment made by Andy?
“The key is for smart marketers to find ways to interract and profit from even the people who might be “spammers”, though many are misguided.”
Maybe it’s just me, but that reads like all Andy’s worried about is how he can use his blog visitors to make some profit from. If that’s the case, surely it goes against his whole argument of “bloggers giving something back to their core community”?
[Reply]
My personal comments on the “dofollow” or “nofollow” issue:
In the view of SEO, when we outbound a “dofollow” link to another website which is not a theme related website, we are losing PR. Imagine each comment having a “dofollow” link to their own website, google will follow those links to all the not-related website and thus you get hard to rank well in the SE. Vise versa, if you “dofollow” a link to a theme related website, and then the website link back to you, you’ll probably get a boost for your PR.
[Reply]